Nutrition Education in Vulnerable Settings: Applying the DESIGN Model in a Rights-Based Food Programme in Barcelona

Authors

  • Elena Carrillo Alvarez Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España.
  • Maria Jose Momares Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España.
  • Júlia Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1817-8937
  • Begoña Caneda Ferrón Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.30.2.2547

Keywords:

Nutrition Education, Food Security, Health Behavior, Vulnerable Populations, Nutrition Policy

Abstract

Introduction: Nutrition education is a key tool to promote healthy and sustainable eating habits, especially in vulnerable contexts. This study describes the design, piloting, and formative evaluation of the ASSEGURA program, developed within the framework of the Alimenta project by the Barcelona City Council, with the aim of enhancing food autonomy among food aid users through a contextualized educational intervention.

Methods: The DESIGN model (Decide, Explore, Set goals, Identify objectives, Generate plans, Nail down evaluation) was applied to structure the educational process in six steps. Steps 1 and 2 were carried out using a mixed-methods approach, including interviews with the program management, focus groups with facilitators and participants, and the administration of validated questionnaires to assess food security, dietary diversity, food literacy, and nutrition knowledge. The intervention design (steps 3–4) was based on Social Cognitive Theory, and three sessions for participants and two workshops for facilitators were implemented (step 5). Evaluation (step 6) was conducted through observation and a final group discussion.

Results: Three behavioral goals were identified: increasing the intake of healthy protein sources, boosting fruit and vegetable consumption, and reducing ultra-processed food intake. Results revealed uneven levels of food literacy, motivation to change, and significant structural and capacity-related barriers. Facilitators showed limited knowledge of key aspects of healthy eating. The qualitative evaluation showed improvements in participants’ perceived autonomy and ability to plan meals, although economic and structural constraints persisted.

Conclusion: The DESIGN model proved useful for structuring educational interventions tailored to vulnerable settings. Findings underscore the importance of complementing nutrition education with policies that ensure access to healthy food, thus reinforcing the right to adequate nutrition.

Funding:  This study was funded by the Barcelona City Council under the collaboration agreement for the development of the Alimenta program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Júlia, Global Research on Wellbeing (GRoW), Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, España.

Júlia Muñoz es dietista-nutricionista graduada por la Universidad Ramon Llull y especializada en salud pública y nutrición por la Universidad de Glasgow. En 2018, se adentró en el mundo de la investigación como dietista-nutricionista del equipo de trabajo de campo del estudio Predimed-Plus (Barcelona) a la vez que colaboraba con el grupo de investigación Global Research on Wellbeing. En este último, participó en la creación de una cesta de alimentos saludables y sostenibles (ASS) para adultos en España a partir de la metodología europea de los presupuestos de referencia. Este trabajo sembró el inicio del que es su tema principal de investigación actual: comprender en qué consiste una ASS des de todas sus dimensiones, e investigar las vías potenciales de promoción de una ASS teniendo en cuenta la perspectiva social. Así pues, en 2020 inicia los estudios de doctorado con el fin de alcanzar los siguientes objetivos: 1) definir a través de la optimización multiobjetivo una ASS teniendo en cuenta una perspectiva multidimensional de la sostenibilidad (coste, cultura, adecuación nutricional, emisiones, uso del agua, uso de la tierra); 2) elaborar una herramienta sensible a las diferencias sociales que permita identificar las barreras y facilitadores para seguir una ASS.

Durante esta trayectoria, Muñoz ha participado como asistente de investigación en proyectos nacionales e internacionales y colaborado con organizaciones como la EFAD (European Federation of the Associations of Dietitians) o la ICDA (International Confederation of Dietetic Associations). Concretamente, en 2021 trabajó como técnica de proyecto junto a la EFAD para explorar las barreras y facilitadores de las/los dietistas-nutricionistas europeas/os a la hora de recibir formación sobre ASS, y en 2022 entra a formar parte del panel de asesores de la herramienta de alimentación sostenible desarrollada por la ICDA.

Por último, su carrera profesional investigadora ha sido complementada con la consulta privada como dietista-nutricionista.

References

1. Carrillo-Álvarez E. Perspective: food and nutrition insecurity in Europe: challenges and opportunities for dietitians. Adv Nutr. 2023;14(5):995-1004, doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.07.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.07.008

2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Fund for Agricultural Development, United Nations Children’s Fund, World Food Programme, World Health Organization. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. Rome: FAO; 2024. https://www.fao.org/publications/fao-flagship-publications/the-state-of-food-security-and-nutrition-in-the-world/en

3. World Health Organization. Transforming food systems to reduce global inequality and improve food safety and health. Technical brief. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.

4. Martínez-Pérez N, et al. Food insecurity, health, and socioeconomic status: results from the FINESCOP survey at UPV/EHU. Nutrients 2025, 17(8), 1314; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17081314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17081314

5. Moradi S, Mirzababaei A, Dadfarma A, Rezaei S, Mohammadi H, Jannat B, et al. Food insecurity and adult weight abnormality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr. 2019;58(1):45-61, doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1819-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1819-6

6. Moragues-Faus A, Magaña C. Alimentando un futuro sostenible. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona; 2021. https://www.ub.edu/alimentandounfuturosostenible/

7. Frongillo EA, Nguyen HT, Smith MD, Coleman-Jensen A. Food insecurity is more strongly associated with poor subjective well-being in more-developed countries than in less-developed countries. J Nutr. 2019;149(2):330-5, doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy261

8. Gallegos D. Effects of food and nutrition insecurity on global health. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(7):686-97, doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2406458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2406458

9. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Programa Alimenta: Memòria 2022. Barcelona: Institut Municipal de Serveis Socials; 2023. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/dretssocials/sites/default/files/arxius-documents/memoria-alimenta-2022.pdf

10. Cruz Roja Española. Boletín sobre Vulnerabilidad Social N.º 31 – Inseguridad Alimentaria. Madrid: Cruz Roja Española; 24 may 2024. https://www2.cruzroja.es/documents/5640665/13549052/Boletin+sobre+Vulnerabilidad+Social+N%C2%BA+31.pdf

11. Carrillo-Álvarez E, Costa-Tutusaus L, Milà-Villaroel R, Shankar Krishnan N, Salinas-Roca B. Food insecurity and dietary diversity among food aid recipients in urban and rural areas at the COVID-19 outbreak: An exploratory study. World Food Policy. 2024;10(1):83–95. doi:10.1002/wfp2.12070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wfp2.12070

12. Depa J, Gyngell F, Müller A, Eleraky L, Hilzendegen C, Stroebele-Benschop N. Prevalence of food insecurity among food bank users in Germany and its association with population characteristics. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Mar;9:96–101. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.005

13. Ajuntament de Barcelona. Alimenta. Servei Socials. https://ajuntament.barcelona.cat/serveissocials/ca/canal/alimenta

14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Why nutrition education matters. Rome: FAO. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/red-icean/docs/Nutrition%20Education_FAO_Concept%20note.pdf

15. Kinderknecht KL, DiPiazza B, Ogbuehi C, Rampersad G, Odoms-Young A. Key considerations for nutrition education programs and interventions for individuals experiencing food insecurity: an evidence review of reach, implementation, adoption, effectiveness, maintenance and equity. Chicago: Feeding America; 2023. https://www.feedingamerica.org/research/hunger-and-health

16. Ziso D, Chun OK, Puglisi MJ. Increasing access to healthy foods through improving food environment: a review of mixed methods intervention studies with residents of low-income communities. Nutrients. 2022;14:2278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14112278

17. Burgaz C, Gorasso V, Achten WMJ, Batis C, Castronuovo L, Diouf A, et al. The effectiveness of food system policies to improve nutrition, nutrition‑related inequalities and environmental sustainability: a scoping review. Food Secur. 2023;15(5):1313‑44, doi: 10.1007/s12571‑023‑01385‑1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01385-1

18. Abad‑Segura E, González‑Zamar MD, Gómez‑Galán J, Bernal‑Bravo C. Management accounting for healthy nutrition education: a meta‑analysis. Nutrients. 2020;12(12):3715, doi: 10.3390/nu12123715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123715

19. Atoloye AT, Savoie-Roskos MR, Guenther PM, Durward CM. Effectiveness of Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program in changing nutrition-related outcomes among adults with low income: A systematic review. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021;53(8):691–705. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2021.03.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.03.006

20. Kearsey JL, West E, Vairinhos N, Constable N, Chu A, Douglas N, Charlton K. Evaluation of a Nutrition Education and Skills Training programme in vulnerable adults who are at high risk of food insecurity. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023 Nov 14. doi:10.1111/jhn.13264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665123001350

21. Luesse HB, Koch PA, Contento IR. Applying the Nutrition Education DESIGN procedure to the development of the In Defense of Food curriculum. Health Educ J. 2019;78(7):824–38, doi: 10.1177/0017896919850597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896919850597

22. Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Puntaje de diversidad dietética en el hogar (HDDS) para la medición del acceso a los alimentos en el hogar: guía de indicadores. Washington (DC): FANTA/FHI 360; 2006.

23. Coates J, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Escala del componente de acceso de la inseguridad alimentaria en el hogar (HFIAS) para la medición del acceso a los alimentos en el hogar: guía de indicadores. Washington (DC): FHI 360/FANTA; 2007.

24. Begley A, Paynter E, Dhaliwal SS. Evaluation tool development for food literacy programs. Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1617. doi:10.3390/nu10111617. PMID: 30400130; PMCID: PMC6267114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10111617

25. Kliemann N, Wardle J, Johnson F, Croker H. Reliability and validity of a revised version of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(10):1174–80, doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.87. PubMed PMID: 27245211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.87

26. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

27. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv Behav Res Ther. 1978;1:139–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6402(78)90002-4

28. Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard Health Publishing. Healthy Eating Plate. Boston, MA: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; 2011. The Nutrition Source

29. Vidgen HA, Gallegos D. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite. 2014;76C:50–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010

30. Krause C, Sommerhalder K, Beer-Borst S, Abel T. Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(3):378-389.

31. Loopstra R, Tarasuk V. What does increasing severity of food insecurity indicate for food insecure families? Relationships between severity of food insecurity and indicators of material hardship and constrained food purchasing. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2013;8(4):337–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2013.817960

32. Caraher M, Jakšic D, Dolciami F, Stigliani A, Wynne R. Promoting healthy eating habits in the working population: The FOOD Program. MOJ Public Health. 2017;6(4):181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/mojph.2017.06.00181

33. Contento IR, Koch PA. Nutrition Education: Linking Research, Theory, and Practice. 5th ed. Burlington (MA): Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2025. 456 p. ISBN: 978-1284299489.

34. Doustmohammadian A, Mohammadi-Nasrabadi F, Keshavarz-Mohammadi N, Hajjar M, Alibeyk S, Hajigholam-Saryazdi M. Community-based participatory interventions to improve food security: A systematic review. Front Nutr. 2022 Dec 19;9:1028394. doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.1028394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1028394

35. Wallerstein N, Duran B, Oetzel JG, Minkler M, editors. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: Advancing Social and Health Equity. 3rd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2017. 480 p. ISBN: 978-1-119-2588

36. Haynes‑Maslow L, Osborne I, Jilcott Pitts SB. Examining barriers and facilitators to delivering SNAP‑Ed direct nutrition education in rural communities. Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):736–44. doi:10.1177/0890117118821845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117118821845

37. Short E, Thompson D, Taren D, Bryant H, Gonzalez R, Sheava J, et al. Feasibility of a food‑based diabetes self‑management education intervention for food‑insecure patients with type 2 diabetes: a convergent mixed‑methods study. Public Health Nutr. 2023 Dec;26(12):3100–11. doi:10.1017/S1368980023002082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980023002082

38. Otterbach L, Mena NZ, Greene G, Redding CA, De Groot A, Tovar A. Community-based childhood obesity prevention intervention for parents improves health behaviors and food parenting practices among Hispanic, low-income parents. BMC Obes. 2018;5:11. doi:10.1186/s40608-018-0188-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40608-018-0188-2

Published

2026-05-17

How to Cite

Carrillo Alvarez, E., Momares, M. J., Júlia, & Caneda Ferrón, B. (2026). Nutrition Education in Vulnerable Settings: Applying the DESIGN Model in a Rights-Based Food Programme in Barcelona. Spanish Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.30.2.2547

Issue

Section

Research articles